Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kids Helpline
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:19, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
- Kids Helpline (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable organisation. The only apparently independent ref is actually a interview-based article with an office holder and no sign of independent journalism. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:55, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:24, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:24, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- Strong Keep It clearly satisfies WP:GNG. It is similar to the ChildLine charity in the UK, which has never been out of the news since it was created. scope_creep talk 20:10 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- Keep I added some journal paper/studies from Trove about it. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 04:04, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. Its a significant community service which has received widespread publicity. - Shiftchange (talk) 11:59, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.