Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 August 16
August 16
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Legoktm (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Image stolen from a Nike advertising campaign. No claim of fair use, license is clearly invalid. Mosmof (talk) 00:09, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Legoktm (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Meetze in the office.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Source information conflicts with source information at http://www.pixoto.com/images-photography/people/portraits-of-men/that-special-someone-68985577
This is in colour and the other image is in black and white. Stefan2 (talk) 18:22, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Legoktm (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- See #File:Meetze in the office.jpg above. Not eligible for F1 due to different blurriness. Stefan2 (talk) 18:22, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
David Fried sculptures photographs
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Kept - now OTRS 2013081710001795 Ronhjones (Talk) 19:11, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Modern sculpture - No Freedom of Panorama exits in US Ronhjones (Talk) 21:05, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment one of these should be converted to fairuse, to illustrate the style of the artist David Fried, for the currently sandboxed article User:Hindsite/sandbox. Any photo of his sculptures would face the same FoP problem, so it has to be fairuse. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 06:53, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- All of these should be deleted as we should at least get permission from the photographer even if we can't get any permission from the sculptor. Per my findings below, I'm not convinced that we have any permission from the photographer. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:28, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Author (also the sculptor - see my talk page) going via OTRS - just needs a slight tweak to his original e-mail - I think they will all be approved soon. Ronhjones (Talk) 23:21, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- All of these should be deleted as we should at least get permission from the photographer even if we can't get any permission from the sculptor. Per my findings below, I'm not convinced that we have any permission from the photographer. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:28, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:David-fried portrait2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Modern sculpture - No Freedom of Panorama exits in US Ronhjones (Talk) 21:05, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Same photo exists elsewhere on the Internet in lower resolution: http://www.davidfried.com/david_fried_c.v._pg1.html --Stefan2 (talk) 21:44, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Several of the related photos below appear to be from http://www.davidfried.com/abstract_sculpture_group_david_fried_Stemmers-2006.htm but in higher resolution than there. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:44, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Stemmer - SS3 - view.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Modern sculpture - No Freedom of Panorama exits in US Ronhjones (Talk) 21:05, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Modern sculpture - No Freedom of Panorama exits in US Ronhjones (Talk) 21:06, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Modern sculpture - No Freedom of Panorama exits in US Ronhjones (Talk) 21:06, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Modern sculpture - No Freedom of Panorama exits in US Ronhjones (Talk) 21:06, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Modern sculpture - No Freedom of Panorama exits in US Ronhjones (Talk) 21:07, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Modern sculpture - No Freedom of Panorama exits in Belgium Ronhjones (Talk) 21:09, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Modern sculpture - No Freedom of Panorama exits in US Ronhjones (Talk) 21:12, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.