Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pro Plus (company)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep - MrX 17:11, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
- Pro Plus (company) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Questionably notable company as the best I found was this and this and there's simply not much here. Pinging still active taggers Eleassar and Miyagawa. SwisterTwister talk 06:30, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:36, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:36, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Slovenia-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:36, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete I tagged this back in 2009 as I had concerns, and it doesn't appear to be any better now some six years later. Miyagawa (talk) 08:42, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. The company operates the most popular web site in Slovenia, a number of popular TV channels and the first Slovenian pay-per-view video content service. It has been the subject of numerous newspaper articles; [1], [2], etc. --Eleassar my talk 10:25, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 23:12, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 23:12, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Keep, as it remains one of the most notable and relevant media companies in Slovenia. Rather, improve the article about it, to avert any doubt of self-promotion--Davide Denti (OBC) (talk) 09:47, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: I have confirmed company is notable, though article needs improvement. I added two refs to article. It is regularly written about in the Slovenian press, e.g., this 2014 article [3] appears to be about a regulatory complaint against the company for abusing its dominant market power in Slovenia. This by itself is a strong indicator of notability!--Milowent • hasspoken 13:32, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.